<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Minimize SQL Server Blocking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2006/blocking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2006/blocking/</link>
	<description>SQL Server Performance Tuning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anil</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2006/blocking/#comment-3002</link>
		<dc:creator>anil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 10:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?=257#comment-3002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article.
It is too help full to me
Thanks..
Anil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.</p>
<p>It is too help full to me </p>
<p>Thanks..<br />
Anil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clement</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2006/blocking/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?=257#comment-402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good article.
I think you wanted to say RECOVERY MODEL and not BACKUP.
&quot;
In addition, changing the backup method from full to simple will also reduce the overhead incurred by long running transactions. Once you are done with the long running activity, you can switch back to the full backup method. [6.5, 7.0, 2000] Updated 4-17-2006
&quot;
should be:
&quot;
In addition, changing the recovery model from full to simple will also reduce the overhead incurred by long running transactions. Once you are done with the long running activity, you can switch back to the simple recovery model. [6.5, 7.0, 2000] Updated 4-17-2006
&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.</p>
<p>I think you wanted to say RECOVERY MODEL and not BACKUP.<br />
&#8221;<br />
In addition, changing the backup method from full to simple will also reduce the overhead incurred by long running transactions. Once you are done with the long running activity, you can switch back to the full backup method. [6.5, 7.0, 2000] Updated 4-17-2006<br />
&#8221;</p>
<p>should be: </p>
<p>&#8221;<br />
In addition, changing the recovery model from full to simple will also reduce the overhead incurred by long running transactions. Once you are done with the long running activity, you can switch back to the simple recovery model. [6.5, 7.0, 2000] Updated 4-17-2006<br />
&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.216 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-06-19 18:05:57 -->
