<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Identity Property Range Checking in SQL Server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2010/identity-range-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2010/identity-range-check/</link>
	<description>SQL Server Performance Tuning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:31:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaniv</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2010/identity-range-check/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaniv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 07:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?=1914#comment-125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this article and the great query!
I think we should add this condition to eliminate the objects we work on to be user tables AND O.type = &#039;U&#039; alternately replace sys.objects with sys.tables in the JOIN]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this article and the great query!<br />
I think we should add this condition to eliminate the objects we work on to be user tables AND O.type = &#8216;U&#8217; alternately replace sys.objects with sys.tables in the JOIN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
