<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adding Custom Code to the Reporting Services 2008 R2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2011/custom-code-ssrs-reporting-services-2008-r2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2011/custom-code-ssrs-reporting-services-2008-r2/</link>
	<description>SQL Server Performance Tuning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:31:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franco Lopes</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2011/custom-code-ssrs-reporting-services-2008-r2/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Franco Lopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=2661#comment-620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Josh,
Thank you for reply. Well this same functionality can be achieved in various ways like by writing cases in SQL or expressions in SSRS. But the focus of this article was to make users aware that custom code and custom Assembly like features can levarage the SSRS functionality.
For eg:-Custom code can be used to have a common color for your charts.
I hope this answers your question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josh,</p>
<p>Thank you for reply. Well this same functionality can be achieved in various ways like by writing cases in SQL or expressions in SSRS. But the focus of this article was to make users aware that custom code and custom Assembly like features can levarage the SSRS functionality. </p>
<p>For eg:-Custom code can be used to have a common color for your charts.</p>
<p>I hope this answers your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franco Lopes</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2011/custom-code-ssrs-reporting-services-2008-r2/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Franco Lopes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=2661#comment-619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Siva!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Siva!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2011/custom-code-ssrs-reporting-services-2008-r2/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=2661#comment-616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question: What is the benefit of doing this instead of perhaps just including a new column returned by the query/sproc/data source that would perform the evaluation there?
Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: What is the benefit of doing this instead of perhaps just including a new column returned by the query/sproc/data source that would perform the evaluation there?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siva</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2011/custom-code-ssrs-reporting-services-2008-r2/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>siva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 05:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=2661#comment-614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HI,
NICE ARTICLE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI,</p>
<p>NICE ARTICLE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2011/custom-code-ssrs-reporting-services-2008-r2/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>James Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=2661#comment-612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with your main point about the extensibilty features of the custom assembly (CS) but it is not without its drawbacks.
Interesting example.  What happens if the definition of profitability changes?  Recompile and redistribution of the DLL?
Couldn&#039;t/shouldn&#039;t the server backend deliver these business metrics through a Profit level Case statement?  Or potentially the business tier of a multi-tiered application?
Any functionality added to the CS should be carefully scrutinized for its potential benefit/applicability versus its costs.
CS is a powerful tool but it should be used for functionality not delivered directly by any of the components within the applications framework.  For example, automating the printing reports without first having to press the print button.
Thanks for your efforts and my comments from the cheap seats are from my perspective use or lose them as is seen fit for the situation.
Cheers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your main point about the extensibilty features of the custom assembly (CS) but it is not without its drawbacks. </p>
<p>Interesting example.  What happens if the definition of profitability changes?  Recompile and redistribution of the DLL? </p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t/shouldn&#8217;t the server backend deliver these business metrics through a Profit level Case statement?  Or potentially the business tier of a multi-tiered application?</p>
<p>Any functionality added to the CS should be carefully scrutinized for its potential benefit/applicability versus its costs.  </p>
<p>CS is a powerful tool but it should be used for functionality not delivered directly by any of the components within the applications framework.  For example, automating the printing reports without first having to press the print button.</p>
<p>Thanks for your efforts and my comments from the cheap seats are from my perspective use or lose them as is seen fit for the situation.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
