<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL Server T-SQL Tuning &#8211; Temp Tables, Table Variables and Union</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/</link>
	<description>SQL Server Performance Tuning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:31:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shehap El-Nagar</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/#comment-3368</link>
		<dc:creator>Shehap El-Nagar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=3332#comment-3368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes ,it is better to create clustered indexes on #TempDB table before insert to avoid any heap table case and thus avoid any table scan but you can defer creating non clustered indexes after insertion to avoid any additional IO cost for clustered indexes that can impact negatively on DML performance and this is an ultimate abstract should be considered largely for DBs having intensive OLTP transactions (DML transactions)
Let me know if any further help is needed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes ,it is better to create clustered indexes on #TempDB table before insert to avoid any heap table case and thus avoid any table scan but you can defer creating non clustered indexes after insertion to avoid any additional IO cost for clustered indexes that can impact negatively on DML performance and this is an ultimate abstract should be considered largely for DBs having intensive OLTP transactions (DML transactions)  </p>
<p>Let me know if any further help is needed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/#comment-3363</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=3332#comment-3363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it better for performance to create the indexes on a #temp table before or after populating the table using an INSERT?
Of course, creating the indexes first is not an option if you create the temp table using a CTAS (Create Table as Select) statement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it better for performance to create the indexes on a #temp table before or after populating the table using an INSERT? </p>
<p>Of course, creating the indexes first is not an option if you create the temp table using a CTAS (Create Table as Select) statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mhady</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/#comment-3335</link>
		<dc:creator>Mhady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 08:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=3332#comment-3335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read your blog everyday and I really appreciate your]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your blog everyday and I really appreciate your</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hany</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/#comment-3261</link>
		<dc:creator>Hany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=3332#comment-3261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[very good article it helps me a lot thanks for posting it !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good article it helps me a lot thanks for posting it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBA</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/#comment-3257</link>
		<dc:creator>DBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 04:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=3332#comment-3257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite useful!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite useful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anas</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/#comment-3236</link>
		<dc:creator>Anas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 07:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=3332#comment-3236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really enjoy your article !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoy your article !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/#comment-3145</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 07:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=3332#comment-3145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve read your blog and have found it very insightful and have always used it as a go to resource when I needed to know anything SQL related… Thanks so much!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve read your blog and have found it very insightful and have always used it as a go to resource when I needed to know anything SQL related… Thanks so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aanitha</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>Aanitha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=3332#comment-3094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really enjoying following you. You seem very upbeat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoying following you. You seem very upbeat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizky</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/#comment-3091</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 05:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=3332#comment-3091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really enjoying this article . thank you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoying this article . thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rizky</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2012/sql-server-t-sql-tuning-temp-table-union/#comment-2985</link>
		<dc:creator>Rizky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=3332#comment-2985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[your blogs help me a lot ... really thankful to you ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your blogs help me a lot &#8230; really thankful to you &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.225 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-23 12:01:26 -->
