Comments on: Transactional Replication – Unable to Replicate Data onto the Subscriber – A Practical Example http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2013/transactional-replication-unable-to-replicate-data-onto-the-subscriber/ SQL Server Performance Tuning Fri, 17 May 2013 13:31:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Vinay http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2013/transactional-replication-unable-to-replicate-data-onto-the-subscriber/#comment-1811 Vinay Thu, 05 Apr 2012 06:17:43 +0000 http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=2906#comment-1811 Hi Satnam,

Its a usefull article. Small correction you have missed the numbering. Under OLTP points, the point 2 should be 3 i believe.

Thanks

]]> By: Reddy http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2013/transactional-replication-unable-to-replicate-data-onto-the-subscriber/#comment-1803 Reddy Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:13:03 +0000 http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=2906#comment-1803 Nice case study.

Would it be worth to take a look at the transactions at subscriber to check as to why they are blocked. Were they insert statements and if so asking why subscribers are getting updated in transactional replication.

Capturing SQL Text by using DMV or using Activity to check queries which were blocked would have been helpful.

I know in situations like this the first thing anybody/dba would think of restoring replication as soon as possible but I think it would be worth checking as to why this issue was caused.(Root Cause Analysis).

Good case study. :)

]]> By: sqldba http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2013/transactional-replication-unable-to-replicate-data-onto-the-subscriber/#comment-1488 sqldba Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:44:06 +0000 http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=2906#comment-1488 Is it worth to kill sleeping processes unless they were participating in blocking(open tran,etc)?

]]>