Site sponsored by: Idera Try Idera’s new SQL admin toolset
SQL Server Performance

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Tips
  • Quiz
  • FAQ's
  • Blogs
  • Software
  • Books
  • About Us
RSS Feeds
Sign in | Join


Article Topics

All Articles
Performance Tuning
Audit
Business Intelligence
Clustering
Reporting Services
Developer
General DBA
ASP.NET / ADO.NET

Write for Us

Share you SQL Server knowledge with others and raise your profile in the community More...
Latest Articles

Policy Based Management in SQL Server 2008
Inside SQL Server Cluster Setup and Troubleshooting Techniques - Part I ...
Configure and Manage Policy Based Management in SQL Server 2008 ...
Using Column Sets with Sparse Columns

More     
 
Latest FAQ's

Cannot Start SQL Server Service
Users are able to connect to report manager but not able ...
Errors when SQL Server Snapshot Replication is Running
How to Display Server Name or IP Address in a Reporting ...

More     
   
Latest Software Reviews

Spotlight on ApexSQL Doc 2008
ApexSQL Enforce
Embarcadero Change Manager
SQL Server DBA Dashboard

More     

articles >> developer >> Handling Cursor-Friendly Problems in T-SQL: Running Totals ...

Handling Cursor-Friendly Problems in T-SQL: Running Totals Example

By : Mirko Marovic
Aug 31, 2006

Page 2 / 3



Cursor Solution

The simplest and at the same time almost the most efficient solution involves the use of a cursor:

create procedure dbo.Sales_sel_by_StoreID_ProductID
               @StoreID int,
               @ProductID int
as begin

     set noCount on
     declare @report table(
               transactionID int primary key clustered,
               transactionTime dateTime not null,
               amount money not null,
               total money not null
          )

     declare runningTotalsCursor cursor for
      select transactionID, TransactionTime, Amount
          from dbo.Sales
          where
               StoreID = @StoreID and
               ProductID = @ProductID and
          order by
               transactionID

     declare @transactionID int
     declare @transactionTime dateTime
     declare @amount money
     declare @total money

     set @total = 0
     open RunningTotalsCursor

     while (0=0) begin

          fetch next from RunningTotalsCursor into @transactionID, transactionTime, @amount

          if @@fetch_status <> 0 break

          set @total = @total + @amount

          insert into @report(transactionID, transactionTime, amount, total) values(@transactionID, @transactionTime, @amount, @total)

     end -- while
     close runningTotalsCursor
     deallocate runningTotalsCursor

     select transactionID, transactionTime, amount, total from @report order by transactionID

     set noCount off

end

If you use SQL Profiler to test the efficiency of the solution, pay attention to the duration, reads, and CPU counter.



Correlated Query Solution

The simplest and the least efficient solution using a data set approach is one that takes advantage of a correlated query. This is almost the definition of a running total: Return all transaction IDs, transaction times, and amounts for a specific product, and store alongside it the sum of all amounts from the first transaction to the current one:

create procedure dbo.Sales_sel_by_StoreID_ProductID
               @StoreID int,
               @ProductID int
as begin

     set noCount on

     select top 10
          a.transactionID,
          a.transactionTime,
          a.amount,
          (select sum(amount)
               from
                    dbo.Sales b
               where
                    b.transactionID <= a.TransactionID and
                    b.StoreID = @StoreID and
                    b.ProductID = @ProductID
          )     as total
     from
          dbo.Sales a
     where
          a.StoreID = @StoreID and
          a.ProductID = @ProductID
     order by transactionID

     set noCount off

end

This query will have N*(N+1)/2 row-reads from the sales table where N is the number of rows returned by the procedure. The consequence is terrible performance compared to the cursor solution. There is a similar solution using join and group by, that also needs N*N magnitude of reads.


<< Prev Page     Next Page>>    








Home | Peformance Articles | Audit Articles | Business Intelligence Articles | Clustering Articles | Developer Articles | Reporting Services Articles | DBA Articles | ASP.NET / ADO.NET Articles | DBA FAQ's | Developer Peformance FAQ's | DBA Peformance FAQ's | Developer FAQ's | Clustering FAQ's | Error Messages | Audit Tool Reviews | Backup Tool Reviews | Coding Tool Reviews | Compare Tool Reviews | Documentation Tool Reviews | Design Tool Reviews | Monitoring Tool Reviews | Log Tool Reviews | Reporting Tool Reviews | Clustering Tool Reviews | Security Tool Reviews | Change Management Tool Reviews | Remote Access Tool Reviews | Book Reviews | Security Tool Reviews | QDPMA Performance Tuning | ADO.NET / ASP.NET | Administration | Analysis/OLAP Services | Application Development | Configuration | Components | ETL | Hardware | High Availability | Hints | Index | Misc | Operating Systems | Performance Tuning | Replication | T-SQL | Views


              © 1999-2008 by T10 Media. All rights reserved