<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>SQL Server Performance &#187; Alex Kozak</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sql-server-performance.com/author/alexkozak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com</link>
	<description>SQL Server Performance Tuning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:37:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ranking Functions and Performance in SQL Server 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2006/ranking-functions-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2006/ranking-functions-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kozak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance Tuning]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ranking functions, introduced in SQL Server 2005, are a great enhancement to Transact-SQL. Many tasks, like creating arrays, generating sequential numbers, finding ranks, and so on, which in pre-2005 versions requires many lines of code, now can be implemented much easier and faster. Let&#8217;s look at the syntax of ranking functions: ROW_NUMBER () OVER ([&#60;partition_by_clause&#62;] [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2006/ranking-functions-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
