<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>SQL Server Performance &#187; Brian Lockwood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sql-server-performance.com/author/brianlockwood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com</link>
	<description>SQL Server Performance Tuning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:37:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Use the Correct ASP (ADO) Syntax to Enable Connection Pooling for Best SQL Server Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/asp-ado-pooling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/asp-ado-pooling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lockwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Performance Tuning]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is much confusion about how to actually implement connection pooling in VB/VBScript code. In this article I have actually tested various ASP syntax variations and verified the results when using connection pooling.To preface &#8211; here are some highlights and some recent findings: Setting connections to &#8220;Nothing&#8221; in ASP does NOT affect connection pooling &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/asp-ado-pooling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Stored Procedures to Manage SQL Server Security</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/security-sp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/security-sp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lockwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General DBA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stored Procedures offer an opportunity to improve your database security. By denying read (SELECT) and write (INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE) access to all database tables and providing only EXECUTE privileges to your stored procedures, you can ensure that your data can be accessed in a much more controlled, restricted medium. Ad hoc SQL no longer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/security-sp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Fix the Problem When ADO Truncates Milliseconds from SQL Server Datetime Columns</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2002/ado-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2002/ado-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2002 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Lockwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Developer]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you create a SQL Server table that contains a datetime column and populate it with a GetDate() default then try to query it with ADO, you will discover that the data returned from datetime columns is returned without milliseconds. If you need milliseconds returned, this can be very annoying to deal with. For example, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2002/ado-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
