<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>SQL Server Performance &#187; Jeremy Kadlec</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sql-server-performance.com/author/jeremykadlec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com</link>
	<description>SQL Server Performance Tuning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:15:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SQL Server Upgrade Recommendations and Best Practices Part 2: SQL Server 6.5 to 2000 Critical Upgrade Decisions and Redundant Upgrade Architecture</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/sql-server-upgrade2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/sql-server-upgrade2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2003 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Kadlec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General DBA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction – SQL Server Upgrades The first article of the series, Part 1 – Upgrade Overview and Project Planning, detailed the business justification for upgrades to SQL Server 2000 related to TCO (Total Cost of Ownership), automation capabilities and new features from both the Business and DBA perspectives. The next portion of the article outlined [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/sql-server-upgrade2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SQL Server Upgrade Recommendations and Best Practices Part 1: Upgrade Overview and Project Planning</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/sql-server-upgrade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/sql-server-upgrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Kadlec</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General DBA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is the first of a multi-part series detailing the SQL Server Upgrade process from the technical, logistical and business perspective. In the coming weeks, expanded articles will be published in the following areas: Part 1 – Upgrade Overview and Project Planning SQL Server 6.5 and 7.0 Critical Upgrade Decisions and Redundant Upgrade Architecture [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2003/sql-server-upgrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
