<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>SQL Server Performance &#187; Sergey Vartanyan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sql-server-performance.com/author/sergeyvartanyan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com</link>
	<description>SQL Server Performance Tuning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Comparison of SQL Server 7.0 with SQL Server 2000</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2002/sql-server-comparison-70-2000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2002/sql-server-comparison-70-2000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2002 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sergey Vartanyan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General DBA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should you stick with SQL Server 7.0, or spend the big bucks to move to SQL Server 2000? To help you make your decision, here are some things to think about. Hardware and Software Requirements ComparisonTo install SQL Server 7.0, you should have the following hardware: Alpha AXP, Intel or compatible platform. Pentium 166 MHz [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2002/sql-server-comparison-70-2000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
