Site sponsored by: Idera Try Idera’s new SQL admin toolset
SQL Server Performance

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Tips
  • FAQ's
  • Blogs
  • Software
  • Books
  • About Us
RSS Feeds
Sign in | Join


FAQ Topics

All FAQ's
General DBA
General Developer
DBA Performance Tuning
Developer Performance Tuning
Clustering
Error Messages

SQL Server 2008 - Worth the Wait

SQL Server’s first significant upgrade in three years features a number of envelope-pushing enhancements and improvements. Which will have the greatest impact on SQL administration and development? More...
Latest Articles

Slowly Changing Dimensions in SQL Server 2005
Audit Data Modifications
SQL Server 2008’s Management Data Warehouse
Same Report but Different Methods in SQL Server Reporting Services ...

More     
 
Latest FAQ's

SSIS Lookups are Case Sensitive
Convert Number to Words in SSRS
After installing SP2 on SQL Server 2005 x64, when trying to ...
Remote Name Could not be Resolved in SQL Server Reporting Services ...

More     
   
Latest Software Reviews

SQL Server DBA Dashboard
SwisSQL DBChangeManager
SQLMesh - SQL Server Search Tool
SoftTreeTech SQL Assistant

More     

Does a SQL Server cluster support load balancing?


Printer friendly

Question

I was told by a friend, that at his last company they had a SQL Server environment which contained four clustered servers that were load balanced. So in effect, when they pulled the plug on one server, the other three would adjust and pick up the load.

From my experience of setting up and using Windows and SQL Server clustering, I cannot for the life of me understand how this is possible. Could you please correct my thinking here and let me know if this is possible using native Microsoft clustering, or load balancing, or both?

 

Answer

You are correct, and your friend is confused. Windows clustering, nor SQL Server clustering, does not natively support load balancing. Clustering's sole purpose is for boosting fault tolerance. When a cluster fails over, all that happens is that the instance of SQL Server running on the failed server is moved to another server. If the server that is being failed over to already has an instance of SQL Server running on it, it will now have two instances, and performance mostly likely will suffer.



Comments:
Your Name  
Email    
(Emails will not be displayed on the site or used for promotional purposes)
Comment  


Type characters in the image
 
 (case sensitive)

 
 
 







Home | Peformance Articles | Audit Articles | Business Intelligence Articles | Clustering Articles | Developer Articles | Reporting Services Articles | DBA Articles | ASP.NET / ADO.NET Articles | DBA FAQ's | Developer Peformance FAQ's | DBA Peformance FAQ's | Developer FAQ's | Clustering FAQ's | Error Messages | Audit Tool Reviews | Backup Tool Reviews | Coding Tool Reviews | Compare Tool Reviews | Documentation Tool Reviews | Design Tool Reviews | Monitoring Tool Reviews | Log Tool Reviews | Reporting Tool Reviews | Clustering Tool Reviews | Security Tool Reviews | Change Management Tool Reviews | Remote Access Tool Reviews | Book Reviews | Security Tool Reviews | QDPMA Performance Tuning | ADO.NET / ASP.NET | Administration | Analysis/OLAP Services | Application Development | Configuration | Components | ETL | Hardware | High Availability | Hints | Index | Misc | Operating Systems | Performance Tuning | Replication | T-SQL | Views