SQL Server Performance

Search Results

Search Again
  1. egmiii

    146GB vs. 72GB Sustained read speeds

    Post by: egmiii, Apr 17, 2007 in forum: SQL Server 2005 Performance Tuning for Hardware
    Joe, Thank you very much! I'm glad to know capacity does not dictate the speed. I'm going to purchase an ML370 G5 1 x 2.66 Quad core chip 8GB Ram...
  2. egmiii

    146GB vs. 72GB Sustained read speeds

    Post by: egmiii, Apr 16, 2007 in forum: SQL Server 2005 Performance Tuning for Hardware
    Our database is about 80GB and grows a GB or less per month. A 10 drive RAID 10 array will give me 360GB (using 72s), which is plenty. So 146s are...
  3. egmiii

    146GB vs. 72GB Sustained read speeds

    Thread by: egmiii, Apr 16, 2007, 8 replies, in forum: SQL Server 2005 Performance Tuning for Hardware
    I'm looking to purchase a new HP ML370 G5, with the external MSA50 enclosure. I'm debating between the 72GB and 146GB 2.5" 10,000 RPM drives. The 72s...
  4. egmiii

    ML350 G4p, Sustained disk IO is poor

    Post by: egmiii, Apr 13, 2007 in forum: SQL Server 2005 Performance Tuning for Hardware
    Thanks for your response. The C/D drive follows the proper curve as the drive head moves from the outer to inner part. Should all RAID 10 arrays on...
  5. egmiii

    ML350 G4p, Sustained disk IO is poor

    Thread by: egmiii, Apr 12, 2007, 3 replies, in forum: SQL Server 2005 Performance Tuning for Hardware
    I recently ran HD Tach on my drives and was surprised at the poor results. 1 HP Smart Array 6400 controller (2 Channels) C:/D: 2x300GB 10,000 RPM...
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search Again