SQL Server Performance

Search Results

Search Again
  1. SandraV

    SQL Cluster running at 97% memory utilization after Windows 2003 SP2 install

    Thread by: SandraV, Apr 27, 2009, 2 replies, in forum: Performance Tuning for Hardware Configurations
    I know SQL 2000 is ancient history but we've just recently installed Windows 2003 SP2 on a SQL 2000 cluster (plus a firmware update and hot fixes)....
  2. SandraV

    Should I set a maximum memory for this clustered, 64 bit server?

    Post by: SandraV, Aug 14, 2008 in forum: SQL Server 2005 General DBA Questions
    > Is that archive server also part of cluster? Yes, these are two nodes in the same active/active cluster. > Have you observed the resource usage...
  3. SandraV

    Should I set a maximum memory for this clustered, 64 bit server?

    Post by: SandraV, Aug 14, 2008 in forum: SQL Server 2005 General DBA Questions
    Yes, I know we should have identical nodes. We don't and that was done purposely by our engineering group. I'm not happy with it but that's not...
  4. SandraV

    Should I set a maximum memory for this clustered, 64 bit server?

    Thread by: SandraV, Aug 13, 2008, 4 replies, in forum: SQL Server 2005 General DBA Questions
    I've got an active/active cluster with two 64 bit SQL 2005 Enterprise instances. One of the servers has 16 GB of memory, the other has 32 GB. The...
Showing results 1 to 4 of 4
Search Again