SQL Server Performance

Poll: on SQL Server 2005

Discussion in 'Forum Announcements' started by dineshasanka, Sep 15, 2005.

  1. dineshasanka Moderator

  2. satya Moderator

    Total votes are not updated on main screen, but after opting out it shows the results.
    As of now for me 'no upgrades, only for new Projects'.

    Satya SKJ
    Moderator
    http://www.SQL-Server-Performance.Com/forum
    This posting is provided “AS IS” with no rights for the sake of knowledge sharing.
  3. Madhivanan Moderator

    &gt;&gt;As of now for me 'no upgrades, only for new Projects'.<br /><br />Same to me [<img src='/community/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt=':)' />]<br /><br />Madhivanan<br /><br />Failing to plan is Planning to fail
  4. FrankKalis Moderator

    I will install it (finally) when the RTM version is available, but I don't think my company is considering it at all.

    --
    Frank Kalis
    Microsoft SQL Server MVP
    http://www.insidesql.de
    Ich unterstütze PASS Deutschland e.V. http://www.sqlpass.de)
  5. dineshasanka Moderator

  6. dineshasanka Moderator

  7. Adriaan New Member

    No upgrade, only for new projects.
  8. ghemant Moderator

    no upgrades, only for new projects

    Hemantgiri S. Goswami
    ghemant@gmail.com
    "Humans don't have Caliber to PASS TIME , Time it self Pass or Fail Humans" - by Hemantgiri Goswami
  9. dineshasanka Moderator

  10. ghemant Moderator

    Hi Dinesh,<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by dineshasanka</i><br /><br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by ghemant</i><br /><br />no upgrades, only for new projects<br /><br /><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"><br /><br />seems to be the pattern of SQL-Server-perfromance.com<br /><br />----------------------------------------<br />Cast your vote <br /<a target="_blank" href=http://www.geocities.com/dineshasanka/sqlserver05.html>http://www.geocities.com/dineshasanka/sqlserver05.html</a><br /><br /<a target="_blank" href=http://spaces.msn.com/members/dineshasanka>http://spaces.msn.com/members/dineshasanka</a><br /><br /><hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"><br /><br />hmmm but , we are not upgrading our sql2k box to sql2005 for existing system, first we did it for new projects that going to starts after two month and then only we will make upgrades to existing projects , i think its obvious [<img src='/community/emoticons/emotion-1.gif' alt=':)' />].<br /><br /><br /><br />Hemantgiri S. Goswami<br />ghemant@gmail.com<br />"Humans don't have Caliber to PASS TIME , Time it self Pass or Fail Humans" - by Hemantgiri Goswami<br />
  11. bradmcgehee New Member

    Same here. Our company, as a policy, does not do upgrade in place. Only when we roll out new servers do we use the latest software. Another issue we run into is that a lot of third party software may not run with 2005 unless it is updated, and this often takes months or years.

    -----------------------------
    Brad M. McGehee, MVP
    Webmaster
    SQL-Server-Performance.Com

Share This Page