Check out this new kbArticle:http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;917047 -- Frank Kalis Microsoft SQL Server MVP http://www.insidesql.de Heute schon gebloggt?http://www.insidesql.de/blogs Ich unterstuetze PASS Deutschland e.V. http://www.sqlpass.de)
Thanks for share. I think is more for 2005 than 7 or 2000. Luis Martin Moderator SQL-Server-Performance.com Although nature commences with reason and ends in experience it is necessary for us to do the opposite, that is to commence with experience and from this to proceed to investigate the reason. Leonardo Da Vinci Nunca esperes el reconocimiento de tus hijos, eso ocurrirá luego de tu muerte All postings are provided “AS IS†with no warranties for accuracy.
I believe it's for all versions of SQL Server. -- Frank Kalis Microsoft SQL Server MVP http://www.insidesql.de Heute schon gebloggt?http://www.insidesql.de/blogs Ich unterstuetze PASS Deutschland e.V. http://www.sqlpass.de)
Yes, but I read tempdb in 2005 is more efficient than 2000. That is why I think that. Luis Martin Moderator SQL-Server-Performance.com Although nature commences with reason and ends in experience it is necessary for us to do the opposite, that is to commence with experience and from this to proceed to investigate the reason. Leonardo Da Vinci Nunca esperes el reconocimiento de tus hijos, eso ocurrirá luego de tu muerte All postings are provided “AS IS†with no warranties for accuracy.
I would say this is suitable for both SQL 2000 on high-end systems and SQL 2005 in general. Satya SKJ Microsoft SQL Server MVP Contributing Editor & Forums Moderator http://www.SQL-Server-Performance.Com This posting is provided “AS IS†with no rights for the sake of knowledge sharing.