Site sponsored by: Idera Try Idera’s new SQL admin toolset
SQL Server Performance

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Tips
  • Quiz
  • FAQ's
  • Blogs
  • Software
  • Books
  • About Us
RSS Feeds
Sign in | Join


Product Reviews

All Reviews
Audit Tools
Backup Tools
Change Management Tools
Clustering Tools
Coding Tools
Design Tools
Diff / Compare Tools
Documentation Tools
Job Management Tools
Log Recovery Tools
Monitoring Tools
Remote Access Tools
Reporting Tools
Security Tools
Testing Tools

Write for Us

Share you SQL Server knowledge with others and raise your profile in the community More...
Latest Articles

Capture DDL Changes using Change Data Capture with SQL Server 2008 ...
Business Intelligence in Collaborative Planning, Forecasting and Replenishment
Inside SQL Server Cluster Setup and Troubleshooting Techniques - Part I ...
Configure and Manage Policy Based Management in SQL Server 2008 ...

More     
 
Latest FAQ's

Cannot Start SQL Server Service
Users are able to connect to report manager but not able ...
Errors when SQL Server Snapshot Replication is Running
How to Display Server Name or IP Address in a Reporting ...

More     
   
Latest Software Reviews

Spotlight on ApexSQL Doc 2008
ApexSQL Enforce
Embarcadero Change Manager
SQL Server DBA Dashboard

More     

reviews >> monitoring tools >> Improve Database System Performance With Diskeeper ...

Improve Database System Performance With Diskeeper

By : Dinesh Asanka
Jun 05, 2007

Page 2 / 3

File Structure

File structure shows the fragmentation level and relative location of files and folders on the hard disk.

The screenshot below was taken before running defragmentation and clearly shows that there were a lot of fragmented files and folders. (Here again, I would have liked to see the percentages.)

After defragmentation, file and folder fragmentation has clearly gone down. Note, however, that the paging file is still fragmented.

Statistics

You can compare the statistics before and after defragmentation of a hard disk, which in this case clearly shows that there was a definite improvement after running Diskeeper.

Let's summarize the key figures:

 

Before Diskeeper Ran

After Diskeeper Ran

Fragmented directories

812

10

Excess directory fragments

3,838

16

Total fragmented files

20,183

97

Total excess fragments

55,546

664

Paging file fragmentations

2

2

Volume fragmentation

23 %

9 %

Data fragmentation

25 %

10 %

Except for the paging file fragmentation, all these factors improved after the execution of Diskeeper.

Scheduling

Scheduling is very tricky with the Windows defragmentation tool. In Diskeeper, however, this can be achieved very easily. All you need do is just move the mouse on the schedule. You can schedule this operation weekly or for a specific date.


<< Prev Page     Next Page>>    








Home | Peformance Articles | Audit Articles | Business Intelligence Articles | Clustering Articles | Developer Articles | Reporting Services Articles | DBA Articles | ASP.NET / ADO.NET Articles | DBA FAQ's | Developer Peformance FAQ's | DBA Peformance FAQ's | Developer FAQ's | Clustering FAQ's | Error Messages | Audit Tool Reviews | Backup Tool Reviews | Coding Tool Reviews | Compare Tool Reviews | Documentation Tool Reviews | Design Tool Reviews | Monitoring Tool Reviews | Log Tool Reviews | Reporting Tool Reviews | Clustering Tool Reviews | Security Tool Reviews | Change Management Tool Reviews | Remote Access Tool Reviews | Book Reviews | Security Tool Reviews | QDPMA Performance Tuning | ADO.NET / ASP.NET | Administration | Analysis/OLAP Services | Application Development | Configuration | Components | ETL | Hardware | High Availability | Hints | Index | Misc | Operating Systems | Performance Tuning | Replication | T-SQL | Views


              © 1999-2008 by T10 Media. All rights reserved