<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>SQL Server Performance &#187; OR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sql-server-performance.com/tag/or/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com</link>
	<description>SQL Server Performance Tuning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Whether to use UNION or OR in SQL Server Queries</title>
		<link>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2011/union-or-sql-server-queries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2011/union-or-sql-server-queries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 03:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dinesh Asanka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General DBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNION]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sql-server-performance.com/?p=2504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I came across with an article on DB2 about using Union instead of OR. So I thought of carrying out a research on SQL Server on what scenarios UNION is optimal in and which scenarios OR would be best. I will analyze this with a few scenarios using samples taken  from the AdventureWorks database [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sql-server-performance.com/2011/union-or-sql-server-queries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
