Site sponsored by: Idera The gold standard of SQL Server performance monitoring & diagnostics.
SQL Server Performance

  • Home
  • Articles
  • Forums
  • Tips
  • Quiz
  • FAQ's
  • Blogs
  • Software
  • Books
  • About Us
RSS Feeds
Sign in | Join


Tip Topics

All Tips
ADO.NET / ASP.NET
Administration
Analysis/OLAP Services
Application Development
Configuration
Components
ETL
Hardware
High Availability
Hints
Index
Misc
Operating Systems
Performance Tuning
Replication
T-SQL
Views

Write for Us

Share your SQL Server knowledge with others and raise your profile in the community More...
Latest Articles

Recover Data Using Database Snapshots
Analyze and Fix Index Fragmentation in SQL Server 2008
Powerful Geographical Visualisations made easy with SQL 2008 Spatial (Part 2) ...
Backup User Databases Using a Maintenance Plan

More     
 
Latest FAQ's

How to alter a User Defined Data Type?
How to unzip a File in SSIS?
How to view previous query plans?
ALTER TABLE SWITCH statement failed because the object '%.*ls' is not ...

More     
   
Latest Software Reviews

Spotlight on ApexSQL Doc 2008
ApexSQL Enforce
Embarcadero Change Manager
SQL Server DBA Dashboard

More     

tips >> t-sql >> SQL Server Transact-SQL Transactions

SQL Server Transact-SQL Transactions

By : Brad McGehee
Jan 10, 2005

If you have created a complex transaction that includes several parts, one part of which has a higher probability of rolling back the transaction than the others, better performance will be provided if you locate the most likely to fail part of the transaction at the front of the greater transaction. This way, if this more-likely-to-fail transaction has to roll back because of a failure, there has been no resources wasted on the other less-likely-to-fail transactions. [6.5, 7.0, 2000, 2005] Added 7-2-2003 

*****

Generally, you only want to encapsulate your Transact-SQL code inside a transaction if it is going to modify the database. Transactions help to ensure database consistency and are an important tool in the developer's toolbox.

But if you put non-database modifying Transact-SQL in a transaction, you are producing unnecessary overhead for your application and SQL Server. For example, Transact-SQL used for creating reports doesn't usually need the benefits (and the extra overhead) associated with transactions. [6.5, 7.0, 2000, 2005] Updated 10-30-2003


        








Home | Peformance Articles | Audit Articles | Business Intelligence Articles | Clustering Articles | Developer Articles | Reporting Services Articles | DBA Articles | ASP.NET / ADO.NET Articles | DBA FAQ's | Developer Peformance FAQ's | DBA Peformance FAQ's | Developer FAQ's | Clustering FAQ's | Error Messages | Audit Tool Reviews | Backup Tool Reviews | Coding Tool Reviews | Compare Tool Reviews | Documentation Tool Reviews | Design Tool Reviews | Monitoring Tool Reviews | Log Tool Reviews | Reporting Tool Reviews | Clustering Tool Reviews | Security Tool Reviews | Change Management Tool Reviews | Remote Access Tool Reviews | Book Reviews | Security Tool Reviews | QDPMA Performance Tuning | ADO.NET / ASP.NET | Administration | Analysis/OLAP Services | Application Development | Configuration | Components | ETL | Hardware | High Availability | Hints | Index | Misc | Operating Systems | Performance Tuning | Replication | T-SQL | Views


              © 1999-2008 by T10 Media. All rights reserved